Medical Checklists

Comprehensive clinical checklists for healthcare professionals

King's College London Medical Interview Guide

📚 Complete MMI Preparation Guide

30 Sample questions with model answers and assessment criteria for outstanding performance

⭐ 1. Motivation for Medicine & "Why King's?"

Criteria Assessed:
  • Insight into motivation
  • Understanding of medical career demands
  • Understanding of King's curriculum
  • Personal suitability
  • Reflection
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Gives clear, genuine, well-reflected reasons for medicine
  • Demonstrates deep understanding of challenges
  • Connects personal experiences to motivations thoughtfully
  • References specific aspects of KCL's curriculum/hospitals
  • Shows maturity, self-awareness, and insight into the profession

Model Answer:

I'm drawn to medicine because it combines my interest in science with meaningful human impact. During my volunteering at a care home, I saw how good communication, dignity, and empathy transformed patient experience. I enjoyed applying problem-solving skills to help staff with small tasks, and realised I wanted a career where science directly improves lives. Medicine offers lifelong learning, teamwork, and the opportunity to support patients during their most vulnerable moments, which is something I value deeply.

Model Answer:

King's offers early clinical exposure, a strong emphasis on patient-centred teaching, and world-leading hospitals like Guy's, St Thomas', and King's College Hospital. I value the integrated curriculum, the opportunity to learn from diverse patient populations, and the option to pursue research through the intercalated BSc. I also appreciate KCL's reputation for producing well-rounded, socially aware doctors.

Model Answer:

While shadowing a GP, I observed a consultation where a patient with chronic pain was struggling emotionally. The GP balanced clinical reasoning with compassion, and the patient left less anxious. I realised how impactful that partnership can be, and I wanted to develop the skills required to support people in that way.

Model Answer:

I learn best when theory is linked to real cases. King's early patient contact and integrated teaching allow me to understand science in a clinical context. The mix of lectures, small-groups, anatomy dissection, and placements aligns with my preference for varied, interactive learning.

Model Answer:

I'm empathetic, communicate clearly, and stay calm under pressure. In group projects I often take a mediator role, ensuring everyone is heard. From volunteering, I've learned patience and adaptability. I'm reflective and open to feedback, which is essential for lifelong development.

Model Answer:

I considered other careers like biomedical research and nursing, but medicine uniquely combines diagnostic reasoning, continuity of care, leadership, and the chance to integrate science with long-term patient relationships. The holistic responsibility doctors have matches the career I aspire to.

⭐ 2. Communication & Role-Play Stations

Criteria Assessed:
  • Verbal communication
  • Non-verbal communication
  • Empathy
  • Active listening
  • Structure and clarity
  • Managing emotions
  • Professionalism
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Warm, empathetic, calm, highly patient-centred
  • Clear explanations using appropriate language
  • Excellent active listening (checking understanding, paraphrasing)
  • De-escalates emotions effectively
  • Structured approach (e.g., SPIKES)
  • Demonstrates professionalism consistently

Model Answer:

I would acknowledge their frustration, apologise for the delay, and explain the situation honestly. I'd emphasise that delays often occur because staff are giving each patient the time they need—including them. I'd check if they need anything while they wait and ensure they feel listened to.

Model Answer:

I'd approach them privately and non-judgmentally. I'd explain the impact on the group, ask if anything is affecting their ability to contribute, and offer support. Together, we'd agree on a fair distribution of tasks. If the issue continued, I'd escalate appropriately.

Model Answer:

I'd use SPIKES: set up a private space, find out what the patient already understands, warn them gently that the results aren't entirely clear, explain calmly that further tests are needed, and reassure them that this is precautionary. I'd allow questions and check their emotional response.

Model Answer:

I would say: "Blood pressure is the force of your blood pushing against your blood vessels. If it's too high for a long time, it can strain your heart and increase risks like strokes. The good news is that lifestyle changes and medicines can help keep it under control."

Model Answer:

I'd explore their concerns with open questions, check their understanding, and provide balanced information on risks and benefits. If they have capacity, I'd respect their autonomy while ensuring they feel supported and informed.

Model Answer:

I'd tell them I've noticed they haven't been present and ask if everything is okay. I'd listen actively, offer help, and suggest speaking with a tutor if needed. I'd avoid assumptions and approach the situation with empathy.

⭐ 3. Ethical Scenario Stations

Criteria Assessed:
  • Identification of ethical principles
  • Balanced, logical reasoning
  • Structure
  • Understanding of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice
  • Appreciation of all stakeholders
  • Professionalism & compassion
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Identifies ethical conflicts clearly
  • Applies all relevant principles appropriately
  • Considers multiple viewpoints fairly
  • Provides balanced, well-reasoned conclusions
  • Demonstrates compassion and non-judgment
  • Avoids extremes; maintains safe, professional perspective

Model Answer:

I'd emphasise the principles of best interests, autonomy (through parents), and beneficence. While parental wishes matter, doctors have a duty to protect the child. If persuasion and discussion fail, courts can intervene to ensure the child receives life-saving care.

Model Answer:

Organ allocation should follow fairness, utility, and medical need—not age alone. Age may be considered only when it affects likelihood of benefit or survival, but blanket prioritisation would be discriminatory.

Model Answer:

Patient safety comes first. I'd encourage the colleague to report the incident and offer support. If they refuse, I would escalate through appropriate channels to ensure transparency and learning.

Model Answer:

Doctors have the right to protest unsafe working conditions, which ultimately protect patients. However, strikes must minimise harm—for example through emergency cover—and be used only after other options fail.

Model Answer:

It would be ethically wrong to punish individuals for lifestyle choices that are often influenced by social factors. Prioritisation should be based on clinical benefit and need, not judgement.

Model Answer:

AI can support diagnosis and reduce workload, but ethical use requires transparency, oversight, protection of patient data, and avoidance of bias. AI should assist—not replace—clinical judgement.

⭐ 4. NHS & Healthcare Knowledge

Criteria Assessed:
  • Understanding of NHS structure
  • Awareness of current challenges
  • Insightful reasoning, not just listing facts
  • Public-health awareness
  • Balanced, feasible solutions
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Provides accurate, current insight
  • Explains causes and consequences clearly
  • Suggests realistic, balanced improvements
  • Demonstrates awareness of inequalities & system pressures
  • Shows maturity in understanding complex healthcare systems

Model Answer:

Key challenges include staffing shortages, increasing demand from an ageing population, long waiting times, funding pressures, and burnout among healthcare workers.

Model Answer:

There has been greater digitalisation (e.g., remote consultations), large backlogs in elective care, increased awareness of public-health preparedness, and heightened pressure on staff wellbeing.

Model Answer:

Yes—preventive care reduces long-term costs, improves population health, and reduces inequalities. However, it requires upfront investment and collaboration beyond healthcare alone.

Model Answer:

Yes, but it will require sustainable funding, tackling inefficiencies, modernising services, and addressing workforce shortages. Maintaining equity of access must remain the priority.

Model Answer:

Solutions include expanding workforce capacity, improving patient flow, investing in community care, extending clinic hours where feasible, and utilising digital tools to increase efficiency.

⭐ 5. Data Interpretation & Critical Thinking

Criteria Assessed:
  • Correct reading of data
  • Identifying trends & anomalies
  • Logical reasoning
  • Avoiding overinterpretation
  • Evaluating evidence quality
  • Clinical/public-health implications
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Summarises trends clearly and concisely
  • Notes anomalies or subgroup differences
  • Provides logical interpretations with plausible causes
  • Demonstrates excellent critical appraisal
  • Highlights limitations of the data/study
  • Connects findings to real-world implications

Model Answer:

I'd describe the general upward trend, note any plateaus or accelerations, and highlight age or region differences if shown. Interventions include school nutrition programmes, physical-activity initiatives, marketing regulation, and targeted public-health campaigns.

Model Answer:

I'd compare effectiveness, side effects, cost, and patient suitability. I'd choose the medication offering the best balance of benefit and safety for the specific patient, explaining uncertainties.

Model Answer:

Possible causes include staff shortages, social-care bottlenecks, increased demand, and reduced bed availability. Solutions require system-wide changes, not just A&E-focused fixes.

Model Answer:

I'd question sample size, study design, funding, control groups, whether it's peer-reviewed, and whether results were replicated. Media summaries often exaggerate findings.

⭐ 6. Reflection, Teamwork & Resilience

Criteria Assessed:
  • Insight into personal strengths & weaknesses
  • Evidence of growth
  • Understanding of teamwork
  • Resilience strategies
  • Self-awareness & honesty
5 – Outstanding Performance:
  • Demonstrates deep, thoughtful reflection
  • Clearly explains what was learned and how behaviour changed
  • Shows responsibility without defensiveness
  • Connects lessons to medical practice
  • Shows excellent understanding of team roles and dynamics

Model Answer:

During a group project, two members clashed over task division. I facilitated a discussion where each person voiced their concerns, and we redistributed tasks fairly. I learned that clear communication prevents conflict and that leadership is often about enabling others.

Model Answer:

I once mismanaged my time for a deadline and submitted work late. I took responsibility, reflected on what went wrong, and now use structured planning tools. It taught me the importance of organisation and asking for help early.

Model Answer:

I maintain structure through planning, break tasks into steps, and use exercise and reflection to decompress. I also speak with friends or mentors when needed. I aim to recognise early signs of stress and address them proactively.

🎯 Key Takeaways for Outstanding Performance

  • Be authentic: Genuine experiences resonate more than rehearsed answers
  • Show reflection: Demonstrate what you learned and how you grew
  • Balance viewpoints: Consider multiple perspectives in ethical scenarios
  • Use structure: SPIKES for communication, ethical frameworks for dilemmas
  • Stay current: Know recent NHS developments and challenges
  • Be compassionate: Always center the patient in your reasoning
  • Practice active listening: In role-plays, truly engage with the scenario
  • Avoid extremes: Balanced, nuanced responses show maturity

Imperial College London Medical Interview Guide

🏛️ Imperial MMI Preparation Pack

20 Sample questions with model answers and comprehensive markschemes

📊 Imperial MMI Format

  • Scoring: 6 points for content + 4 points for communication = 10 total per station
  • Common themes: Teamwork, motivation, empathy, ethics, data interpretation, healthcare awareness
  • Focus on: Academic excellence, research opportunities, diverse London patient populations

⭐ 1. Motivation & Understanding Medicine

Criteria Assessed:
  • Insight into motivation
  • Realistic understanding of medical career demands
  • Understanding of what being a doctor involves (not just treating disease)
  • Personal suitability & reflection
  • Awareness of what Imperial offers
Outstanding Performance:
  • Gives clear, genuine, well-thought-out reasons for studying medicine
  • Demonstrates awareness of the demands, challenges and rewards of a medical career
  • Shows deep self-reflection: connects personal experiences to motivation & suitability
  • Understands and references aspects of Imperial (course structure, environment, opportunities)
  • Exhibits maturity, realistic expectations, and empathy for the role

Model Answer:

I'm drawn to medicine because it combines rigorous scientific thinking with long-term human connection. Through volunteering at a local elderly care home, I saw how continuity of care and empathy made profound differences to residents' wellbeing. Medicine offers the opportunity to use science to help people over their whole lives — something I find deeply meaningful.

Model Answer:

Imperial's reputation for academic excellence, cutting-edge research, and access to diverse patient populations in London appeal to me. The integrated MBBS/BSc structure allows early clinical exposure and research opportunities. I value being challenged academically while learning in a collaborative, diverse environment.

Model Answer:

A doctor must act as an advocate, educator, and supporter. Beyond clinical care, they build trust, understand patients' social/contextual backgrounds, promote prevention and public health, and lead the care team. They must show empathy, communicate clearly, and adapt to changing healthcare needs.

Model Answer:

Through volunteering and part-time work, I've developed resilience, time management, and empathy. For instance, caring for elderly patients taught me patience and active listening. I learned to balance academics with responsibility — a skill vital for the workload of medical school.

⭐ 2. Teamwork, Leadership & Resilience

Criteria Assessed:
  • Ability to work well in a team
  • Leadership when needed — facilitating, supporting, resolving conflict
  • Adaptability under pressure / in difficult situations
  • Self-awareness: strengths/weaknesses, coping strategies
  • Resilience and realistic approach to stress
Outstanding Performance:
  • Demonstrates clear example(s) of effective teamwork or leadership
  • Handles conflict or pressure thoughtfully and calmly
  • Shows honest reflection on personal strengths/weaknesses
  • Offers realistic, balanced coping/resilience strategies
  • Exhibits maturity, responsibility, and empathy

Model Answer:

In a group project, two members disagreed on roles and deadlines, which stalled progress. I initiated a calm discussion, asked each person to voice concerns, and helped reassign tasks respecting strengths and availability. We completed the project successfully. I learned that open communication and fair leadership sustain teamwork.

Model Answer:

While volunteering, I once helped a patient fall suddenly in the care home. I stayed calm, alerted staff, comforted the patient, and helped reassure them until professional care arrived. The experience taught me to keep composure, act responsibly, and prioritise patient safety under stress.

Model Answer:

My strength is empathy and communication — I naturally connect with people and understand their concerns. My weakness is perfectionism: sometimes I spend too long refining tasks. I'm learning to balance quality with efficiency, and set realistic time limits on tasks.

Model Answer:

I would use structured time management, break tasks into manageable parts, and ensure rest and social support. I believe in seeking help early — talking to peers or mentors — and mindful reflection. Being self-aware of stress and proactive about support helps sustain long-term resilience.

⭐ 3. Empathy & Communication (Role-Play)

Criteria Assessed:
  • Empathy and emotional awareness
  • Clarity and appropriateness of communication (verbal and non-verbal)
  • Ability to listen and respond sensitively
  • Structure and clarity of explanation
  • Patient-centredness: respect, dignity, support
Outstanding Performance:
  • Warm, calm, empathetic tone; demonstrates genuine concern for the patient or their values
  • Explains complex or sensitive information clearly and appropriately (no jargon)
  • Actively listens: invites questions, checks understanding, shows patience
  • Maintains professionalism and respect throughout
  • Creates a safe, supportive environment; balances honesty with compassion

Model Answer (Structure):

First, ensure privacy and a calm environment. Ask what the patient already understands. Explain results clearly, highlighting uncertainty: "The test isn't conclusive, so further tests are needed." Reassure them that this is common, outline next steps, and invite questions. Show empathy and patience throughout.

Model Answer (Structure):

Listen attentively, validate their concerns, and explain confidentiality, consent, and patient autonomy sensitively. Offer to involve the adolescent in discussion, encourage open communication, and highlight support services. Maintain empathy, neutrality, and clarity.

Model Answer:

I'd ask open questions to understand their concerns and cultural beliefs. I'd explain medical information in accessible language, show respect for their values, and offer alternative options if feasible. I'd emphasise shared decision-making and ensure they feel heard, respected and supported.

Model Answer:

Good communication builds trust, ensures patients understand their condition and treatment, improves compliance, and reduces anxiety. Empathy helps in understanding patients' context — social, emotional, cultural — leading to holistic care, better patient outcomes, and improved patient-doctor relationships.

⭐ 4. Ethics & Professionalism

Criteria Assessed:
  • Recognition and understanding of ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, justice, non-maleficence)
  • Balanced, reasoned argument (not one-sided)
  • Consideration of all stakeholders (patient, family, society, profession)
  • Respect, compassion, professionalism
  • Ability to reflect on complexity and nuance
Outstanding Performance:
  • Clearly identifies relevant ethical issues without prompting
  • Applies multiple ethical principles appropriately
  • Argues thoughtfully, fairly, and acknowledges nuance and complexity
  • Shows empathy and respect for all parties involved
  • Avoids black-and-white answers; considers broader implications and duties

Model Answer:

Yes — if the patient has capacity, their autonomy should be respected. I would ensure they are fully informed, explore their concerns and values, and offer support. If refusal stands, I must respect their wishes while ensuring they understand potential consequences.

Model Answer:

It's ethically complex. Doctors have a duty to protect patient safety, but they also need safe working conditions to give good care. A strike might be justified only if patient safety is maintained (e.g., emergency coverage), and after efforts to negotiate. Transparent communication and minimal risk to patients are essential.

Model Answer:

Decisions should be based on clinical need and likelihood of benefit, not age per se. If both have similar prognosis, priority should be on fairness, not ageism. Blanket policies based on age alone are ethically questionable. Each case must be considered individually, fairly, and respectfully.

Model Answer:

Academic integrity is vital. I'd approach them privately, expressing concern and encouraging honesty. If they refused to acknowledge or correct it, I'd report to the appropriate authority. Patient safety and trust in medicine depend on professionalism and honesty.

⭐ 5. Data Interpretation & Critical Thinking

Criteria Assessed:
  • Accurate interpretation of data/trends
  • Logical reasoning and hypothesis generation (possible causes, implications)
  • Awareness of limitations (bias, sample size, data quality)
  • Application to real-world / public-health / clinical context
  • Clear, structured explanation
Outstanding Performance:
  • Summarises data/trends accurately and succinctly
  • Identifies potential causes and implications logically
  • Highlights limitations of data/study and notes need for caution
  • Connects findings to clinical, societal or public-health context
  • Presents explanation in a clear, well-structured, and coherent manner

Model Answer:

I'd suggest improving community education on lifestyle (diet, exercise), implementing screening programmes, promoting healthy living via schools/workplaces, and collaborating with public health to address social determinants (access to healthy food, socio-economic inequalities). Also, enhance early diagnosis and preventative care to reduce admissions.

Model Answer:

I'd question sample size, absence of control group, lack of blinding, possible placebo effect, bias, and lack of peer review. I'd look for replication, long-term follow-up, transparent methodology, and whether conclusions are overstated. Cautious validation is needed before accepting such claims.

⭐ 6. Healthcare Awareness & Professional Values

Criteria Assessed:
  • Understanding of broader healthcare system challenges and context
  • Realistic, informed awareness of social/ethical/public-health issues
  • Motivation to contribute positively (beyond personal benefit)
  • Professionalism, responsibility, service-orientation
Outstanding Performance:
  • Demonstrates depth of understanding about healthcare challenges (e.g. resource constraints, inequalities)
  • Provides balanced, realistic views and suggestions (not idealistic or extreme)
  • Shows commitment to service, community, and social accountability
  • Connects personal values/experiences to future contribution
  • Shows maturity, insight, and long-term vision

Model Answer:

Key challenges include staff shortages, resource constraints, increasing demand from aging population and chronic disease, mental-health pressures, and health inequalities. Also, balancing innovation (e.g. digital care) with quality, access, and equity. Preventive care and public health promotion are vital, but need support and funding.

Model Answer:

I'd contribute through peer support, participating in outreach and widening-participation initiatives, engaging in research or public-health projects, and promoting a collaborative and inclusive student environment. My background in volunteering equips me to mentor and support others, especially those from underrepresented backgrounds.

🎯 How to Use This Guide Effectively

  • Practice aloud: Use the 20 questions in mock circuits, with a friend or mentor timing 5-minute stations
  • Reflect, don't memorise: Use model answers to guide structure and content, but adapt to your own experiences — genuineness matters
  • After each mock: Score yourself against "outstanding" criteria. Note weaknesses and improve
  • Mix station types: Rotate between motivation, ethics, data, empathy, teamwork
  • Stay informed: Read healthcare news, NHS issues, public-health debates for real-world awareness
  • Remember scoring: 6 points content + 4 points communication = 10 total per station